News & Resources
CR Attorney to Present Lecture at Drexel University
Posted on Jan 30, 2017 in Events
CR Partner Scott Slomowitz will present a guest lecture to students enrolled in the graduate-level Bioinstrumentation II Course at Drexel University’s School of Biomedical Engineering on February 7, 2017. The presentation, entitled “How to Prepare a Good Patent Application and Filing Options”, will provide the students with important strategies/guidance for considering intellectual property protection early in the medical device development process.
Read MoreDisparagement and Trademarks at the US Supreme Court
Posted on Jan 26, 2017 in Articles
Try to make sense of this: The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the trademark “HAVE YOU HEARD THAT SATAN IS A REPUBLICAN?” because it disparaged the Republican party. But when an application was filed for the mark “THE DEVIL IS A DEMOCRAT,” the USPTO agreed that the mark could be registered.
Read MoreCR Attorney to Serve as Panelist for “Apple vs. Samsung: Takeaways from the Smartphone Wars”
Posted on Jan 18, 2017 in Events
CR Partner Gary Greene will serve as a panelist for the Philadelphia Bar Association’s program “Apple vs. Samsung: Takeaways from the Smartphone Wars” on January 25, 2017. This CLE program examines the ongoing litigation regarding design patent protection for smartphones and covers how appearance and design can be protected through the law.
Read MoreCR Attorney Presenting Webinar on After Final Patent Prosecution Strategy
Posted on Jan 16, 2017 in Events
It’s a dilemma – corporations are seeking more patent protection than ever before, yet corporate counsel are under constant pressure to keep costs as low as possible. How are these conflicting objectives addressed? One important aspect of cost-effective patent protection is with regard to After Final Strategy. CR attorney Lawrence Ashery is presenting a webinar on the topic on January 25, 2017 at 12:30 pm EST.
Read MoreThe Hottest Patent Law Issues Of 2016
Posted on Jan 3, 2017 in Articles
As we ring in the new year, it’s now time to look back at the most significant patent law issues of 2016.
Read MorePatents of Interest for 2016
Posted on Dec 28, 2016 in Articles
Would you like to predict the future? It’s possible – just look at patents and patent applications to get a sense of the world of technology that will soon be approaching. While many patents will never lead to actual physical products, others can give a good sense of important business developments that may be just around the corner.
Read MoreCR Attorney Provides Introduction to IP for Local Artists
Posted on Dec 2, 2016 in Events
CR Attorney James Kozuch presented an introductory seminar on Intellectual Property at the Tamaqua Community Art Center in Tamaqua, Carbon County on November 22, 2016. The presentation, entitled “An Introduction to Intellectual Property for Artists and Art Organizations,” provided an overview of patents, trademarks, trade secrets, and copyrights for artists looking to protect their work.
Read MoreMarijuana’s Role in the Pursuit of Trademark Rights
Posted on Nov 29, 2016 in Articles
Last month, we discussed the patentability of marijuana. It was explained that numerous marijuana-related patents already exist and more are expected to be granted. The issues associated with trademarks and marijuana, however, are substantially different.
Read MoreRoxane Gets the Red Light from the Federal Circuit
Posted on Nov 17, 2016 in News
On November 17, 2016, in Roxane Laboratories, Inc. v. Camber Pharmaceuticals Inc., Invagen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Appeal No. 16-1028, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sided with Defendants-Appellees Camber and Invagen, for the second time, in holding that the claim term “size 00 or less” meant “precisely size 00 or less” and excluded the elongated version size 00EL which Defendants were using. Robert S. Silver argued the appeal also represented Appellees.
Read MoreThe State Of Judicial Deference To The USPTO
Posted on Nov 16, 2016 in Articles
Perhaps no doctrine is more significant to our form of government than separation of powers. In the first draft of the Bill of Rights, James Madison wanted to explicitly state that our three branches of government — legislative, executive and judicial — “shall never exercise the power” of each other. His proposal was struck down as being redundant with language articulated by the U.S. Constitution. Separation of powers, it was argued, was already implicit. Yet here we are today, with accusations that the separation of powers doctrine has been eroded.
Read More